Meta Faces Settlement, Dual Lawsuits in Bruising Week of Legal Pressure
- Sara Montes de Oca

- 3 hours ago
- 3 min read
Meta Platforms closed out the week of May 22 on three separate legal fronts, settling a bellwether school district lawsuit over alleged addictive design, reaching agreements with other platforms in the same case, and facing a new suit from the Texas Attorney General claiming WhatsApp's end-to-end encryption promises are false.
The most consequential development may be the settlement with Kentucky's Breathitt County School District, which had sued Meta — along with Snap, YouTube, and TikTok — alleging the platforms' intentional design choices harmed students' mental health and cost the district significant resources to address. The school district had sought more than $60 million to fund long-term mental health and academic recovery programs. The financial terms of Meta's settlement were not disclosed. Snap, TikTok, and YouTube settled with the district late last week.
The Breathitt County case was the first of at least 1,200 similar lawsuits filed by school districts against the four platforms. A jury trial had been scheduled for June.
In its complaint, the district alleged the platforms "exploit the neurophysiology of the brain's reward systems" by using harmful algorithms, push notifications, and infinite scrolling to maximize time on-platform among young users. "America's youth lack the emotional maturity, impulse control, and psychological resiliency to perceive, understand and combat the manipulation and harm that is occurring through the social media platforms," the complaint stated.
The settlement marks a shift for Meta, which had taken earlier cases to trial and argued the lawsuits were without merit. In March, a jury found Meta and YouTube liable for a young California girl's social media addiction and ordered Meta to pay her $6 million. A separate New Mexico jury also ruled against Meta in March, awarding that state $375 million after the attorney general sued over children's safety and mental health concerns.
A Meta spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment on the Kentucky settlement.
Separately, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a lawsuit Thursday alleging that WhatsApp — used by more than 3 billion people — does not provide the end-to-end encryption it has publicly claimed since at least 2016. The complaint cited a Bloomberg report describing a January 16 email sent by a U.S. Commerce Department agent to more than a dozen officials, which stated, "There is no limit to the type of WhatsApp message that can be viewed by Meta."
Meta called the allegations "baseless" and said it would fight the lawsuit in court.
Cryptography researchers were skeptical of the Texas complaint's evidentiary foundation. The lawsuit's sole factual support for the encryption claim is the Bloomberg report; the AG's office has not indicated it obtained the underlying email or conducted independent technical investigation.
Benjamin Dowling, a senior lecturer in cryptography at King's College London and co-author of a 2023 technical analysis of WhatsApp, said his team reverse-engineered the messenger's cryptographic protocol and found no indication it was behaving differently from what Meta described. "Our reverse-engineering of WhatsApp and all the evidence we are aware of points towards WhatsApp providing users with end-to-end encryption for their message contents," Dowling wrote in an email. He noted, however, that his findings apply only to the version of WhatsApp available in May 2023.
Kenny Paterson, a researcher at ETH Zurich, described the suit as "built on a very thin evidence base: essentially, one news article is referenced to support the actual accusation." Matthew Green, a professor at Johns Hopkins University, said that for such a vulnerability to exist, "something very bad would have to be happening inside that app," given that WhatsApp clients are available for reverse engineering.
Paxton is currently in the final stretch of a U.S. Senate primary runoff against incumbent John Cornyn, a timing detail that critics have not overlooked.
With three major jury verdicts or settlements now on the books and more than 1,200 school district cases still pending, the legal landscape surrounding Meta's platform design practices is likely to grow more costly and complex through the remainder of the year.


