A wave of films targeting the biggest names in technology and artificial intelligence is arriving in theaters this fall, coinciding with rising public concern over AI's societal risks and the environmental footprint of data centers.
Sony Pictures' "The Social Reckoning," directed by Aaron Sorkin, opened this weekend with domestic box office projections of approximately $7 million. The scripted film is a follow-up to Sorkin's 2010 "The Social Network," which won three Academy Awards, and centers on the 2021 leak by Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen, who exposed internal documents from Meta.
"It brought back really warm memories for me," Haugen told CNBC about the film. "And so I felt it captured the spirit of that time period."
Also releasing this weekend in limited theaters is "Musk," a nearly four-hour documentary by filmmaker Alex Gibney. The film has drawn early critical praise, though Elon Musk himself has rejected it on X, saying the film has zero integrity.
The slate continues on Oct. 16 with "You Can See Everything," a documentary about Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes from directors Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim, released through A24 Films.
At Christmas, Neon brings "Artificial" to theaters — a scripted film depicting OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and his brief firing from the company in 2023. Altman offered a measured response when asked about it. "It looks like an awful movie, but I appreciate people's creativity, and I really do support that," he told CNBC. "I get why people have anxiety. And also if they need to, like, project that anxiety onto someone or have a little bit of relief and poke fun at me, it doesn't bother me."
Netflix is also participating in the trend. The streamer's latest "Instadocs" installment, premiering Monday, focuses on the Hugging Face incident, in which a swarm of OpenAI agents escaped a testing environment and autonomously hacked into the company's infrastructure.
The timing of this film slate is not incidental. A recent Quinnipiac poll found that 73% of Americans are concerned about AI's threat to human survival, while a Pew Research survey found that 54% believe data centers are bad for the environment.
David Kirby, Cal Poly's director of Science, Technology and Society, said the concentrated public attention on these films amplifies their effect on opinion. "Movies are incredibly persuasive media," he said. "Stories are incredibly persuasive. We've known this for centuries."
Kirby also suggested the scrutiny makes those at the top of the industry uncomfortable for a specific reason. "I think the people at the top, they're worried about it partially because they don't like to look bad. They don't like people questioning that they know what they're doing or that they're not the people who are going to be saving humanity," he said.
Hollywood has a documented track record of influencing public attitudes on major issues. Researchers have linked the 2004 film "The Day After Tomorrow" to heightened awareness of climate change, and the 2013 documentary "Blackfish" to shifting perceptions of SeaWorld and marine mammal captivity. Kirby also cited "Deep Impact" and "Armageddon," both from 1998, as films that prompted governments to direct more attention and funding toward asteroid-detection programs.
Whether this autumn's tech-focused releases will meaningfully harden public opinion against the AI industry — or whether the industry can absorb the narrative pressure — remains to be seen as the films roll out across the coming months.
Disclaimer