House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) pushed back Sunday against calls for emergency congressional action on artificial intelligence, warning that hasty regulation could cost the United States its competitive edge against China, even as at least one Democratic colleague called on Johnson to keep lawmakers in session specifically to address AI risks.
"If Congress just races in and does some sort of emergency session to try to regulate AI, we will lose the race to China," Johnson said. He added that lawmakers and the public should not be alarmed, telling reporters, "We don't need everybody to panic right now."
Johnson's comments came amid renewed pressure from technology leaders who have called for a slowdown in AI development, a position that has spilled into Capitol Hill debates over how — and whether — the federal government should intervene.
Democratic Rep. Greg Stanton (Ariz.) offered a sharply different view the same day, urging Johnson directly to bring Congress back into session to address what Stanton characterized as serious and mounting risks posed by rapidly advancing AI models.
"We should take the warnings of the leading investigators of AI very, very seriously," Stanton told host Chris Stirewalt on NewsNation's "The Hill Sunday."
Stanton did not specify which investigators or findings he was referencing, but his remarks reflect a broader unease among some lawmakers about the pace at which AI capabilities are advancing without corresponding federal oversight frameworks.
The dueling Sunday appearances underscore a deepening partisan fault line over AI policy, with Republicans generally favoring a lighter-touch approach that prioritizes innovation and global competitiveness, while some Democrats press for more structured safety guardrails.
The exchange also arrives as Congress returns from recess to a crowded legislative calendar. Senators are facing pressure to resolve a budget resolution that Republicans need to unlock a third reconciliation package, alongside unfinished work on crypto legislation and the farm bill — leaving little obvious room for AI-specific legislation to advance quickly.
Johnson has not ruled out some form of AI policy engagement but has signaled a preference for deliberate, measured action rather than emergency intervention, reinforcing the view held by many in the Republican conference that the regulatory posture should avoid stifling private-sector development.
Whether Democratic calls for urgency gain traction will depend in large part on how Johnson chooses to prioritize the fall legislative schedule, and whether any bipartisan consensus emerges around specific AI safety benchmarks — a prospect that, for now, remains uncertain.
Disclaimer