Nvidia's stock fell 4.6% on Friday, August 29, closing at $217.55 after touching an intraday high of $229.26 — a reversal that analysts linked less to the company's earnings and more to hawkish remarks from Federal Reserve Chairman Kevin Warsh at the central bank's annual Jackson Hole symposium.
The decline erased more than half of the nearly 9% gain Nvidia posted on Thursday, the session immediately following the company's Wednesday night earnings report.
Warsh, in his first address at Jackson Hole as Fed chair, suggested that interest rates may need to move higher to contain inflationary pressures if current trends do not improve. In response, market odds of a rate hike at the Fed's September meeting increased significantly, according to the CME Group's FedWatch tool.
The Fed's benchmark overnight lending rate influences borrowing costs across the economy, and a tightening cycle would raise the cost of financing the large-scale data center construction that underpins much of Nvidia's revenue trajectory.
Nvidia's quarterly results themselves were not a source of concern. CFO Colette Kress disclosed a surprise revenue growth forecast for fiscal 2028 that analysts described as unusually strong, and the company's underlying business metrics drew broad praise from investors and analysts who reviewed the report.
The pattern drew comparisons to Intel's experience earlier this year, when the chipmaker reported a strong quarter only to see its shares sink during regular trading the following day. The key difference in Nvidia's case was the one-session delay — sellers waited until Friday to act, rather than responding immediately on the first post-earnings session.
The broader rate-sensitivity argument centers on Nvidia's dependence on data center spending, a capital-intensive category that relies heavily on debt financing. If the Warsh-led Fed proceeds with rate increases, the cost of financing that buildout would rise, potentially softening demand from Nvidia's largest customers.
Some observers noted that Nvidia's relatively modest share repurchase program left the company with limited capacity to absorb aggressive selling. By contrast, companies with larger buyback programs — cited as a Sandisk-style capital return approach — could deploy that capital to counteract sudden sell pressure. Micron, for comparison, is under a two-year restriction on large-scale buybacks tied to its CHIPS Act funding, a ban set to expire in December.
The episode underscores how tightly linked Nvidia's stock performance has become to macroeconomic policy, even as the company continues to post strong operating results. With Warsh signaling a willingness to tighten, investors in capital-intensive technology hardware will be watching the Fed's September meeting closely for any indication of whether the central bank follows through on those signals.
Disclaimer