Salesforce has agreed to acquire Fin, an AI-powered customer service platform, for $3.6 billion — the latest in a string of at least six acquisitions since December — even as the company's stock sits roughly 40% lower for the year and analyst skepticism over its AI pivot deepens.
Announced two weeks ago, the deal centers on Fin's flagship product: an AI agent designed to resolve complex customer queries across multiple channels, including email, WhatsApp, Slack, and live chat. Salesforce said Fin's agentic system — capable of planning and executing tasks with minimal human involvement — is powered by the company's proprietary Apex AI model.
Salesforce said Fin will complement its existing Agentforce suite, with particular emphasis on small-to-medium sized businesses seeking to deploy the technology quickly. The deal is expected to close near the end of Salesforce's fiscal year, which concludes in January.
Fin is part of a broader acquisition push. This month alone, Salesforce announced plans to acquire M3ter, a usage-based billing platform, and Contentful, a content management system provider whose customers include Kraft Heinz and Swiss shoemaker On. Terms for both deals were not disclosed. Earlier in the year, Salesforce completed purchases of Qualified, focused on agentic marketing, and Cimulate, targeting agentic e-commerce; pricing for those transactions was also not made public.
The spree follows Salesforce's $8 billion acquisition of cloud data management company Informatica last fall — one of the largest deals in the company's history — which the company framed as integral to its AI strategy given data's role as a key input for AI systems.
Despite the activity, Wall Street has not rewarded the approach. Salesforce shares are down roughly 17% in June alone, on pace for their second-worst monthly performance in three years. Only January of this year was worse, when the stock fell nearly 20% as concerns over AI disruption of software-as-a-service business models began to intensify.
D.A. Davidson analyst Gil Luria, a prominent Salesforce bear, said the dealmaking will not solve the company's core problem. "This isn't going to help. You can't fight narrative," Luria said in an interview. "They can argue with investors until they're blue in the face. It's not going to change investors' minds that AI is a disruption risk for software."
Luria added that Salesforce's priorities are misaligned. "Fixing the actual core business should be the priority, instead of putting all the emphasis on the pivot to AI and trying to counter the negative AI narrative," he said, and argued the company paid too much for Fin relative to its current financial performance.
Not all analysts share that view. In a note to clients dated June 15, Cantor Fitzgerald analysts said the Fin acquisition made strategic sense, maintaining a buy-equivalent rating and a $250 price target on the stock. "A broader point we want to make is that if executed properly, incumbent SaaS vendors could acquire their way to the winner's table in the AI-era," the note read. Cantor argued that AI-native firms like Fin carry innovative products but "lack the necessary scale, financial resources, and distribution" that Salesforce can provide.
Salesforce has pointed to its Agentforce product as evidence of AI traction. The product's annual recurring revenue now stands at $1.2 billion. When combined with data management products Informatica and Data 360, the company said the three carry combined ARR of nearly $3.4 billion — up over 200% from a year earlier. Salesforce is projecting approximately $46 billion in revenue for fiscal 2027.
"Inside our core applications now, we have Agentforce Coworker that lets our customers work with Agentforce directly, giving them tremendous capability to do things that they've just never been able to do before," CEO Marc Benioff said last month on CNBC's "Mad Money."
Salesforce shares did recover somewhat after hitting a multiyear closing low of $150.12 on June 22, climbing more than 5% since then. Whether the Fin deal and continued M&A activity can sustain that recovery — or whether the broader disruption narrative continues to dominate — will be the defining question for the company as it heads into the second half of its fiscal year.
Disclaimer