Travis Kalanick Says Only 1% of Venture Capitalists Are "Helpful" as He Courts Them for $1.7 Billion Robotics Round

Travis Kalanick, the co-founder of Uber, has renewed his long-running critique of the venture capital industry, telling a podcast audience that just 1% of VCs are genuinely helpful to the founders they back — even as his robotics company, Atoms, closes a $1.7 billion fundraise led by Andreessen Horowitz.

The remarks came during an episode of David Senra's podcast that aired last weekend, first reported by TechCrunch, in which Kalanick spoke candidly about his experience with investors across multiple companies.

Kalanick told Senra that "a super high bar for a VC is 'do no harm,'" yet only 10% of investors are capable of meeting even that threshold. A far smaller share — 1%, by his estimate — are actually "helpful."

"But it's hard. How the f* are they supposed to be helpful? ... It's hard for them to participate because they just aren't in that deep," he said.

To illustrate the dynamic, Kalanick compared a founder to the "chess master" of a company, while a VC is a "chess enthusiast" who drops in occasionally to check the state of the game. The relationship, he said, is "inescapably complicated."

The comments carry particular weight given Kalanick's history. During his tenure at Uber, he raised roughly $15 billion in venture funding, making it one of the largest VC-backed runs of its era. His exit from the company in 2017 followed a boardroom confrontation with Bill Gurley of Benchmark — a firm Kalanick now openly advises founders to avoid.

Benchmark, for its part, raised another $2 billion across two new funds in June, suggesting the animus has not materially damaged the firm's standing with limited partners.

Kalanick was careful to stop short of urging founders to bypass VC money altogether. Instead, he offered tactical advice for navigating the current fundraising climate: craft a pitch detailed enough to spark competitive interest among firms, but not so exhaustive that it reads as naïve given how rapidly AI markets are shifting.

He also turned the lens on himself, cautioning founders against what he called a "victim mentality" in the wake of boardroom conflict. "By that, I mean, what was my part in that dynamic?" he said.

Kalanick acknowledged that his management style was a contributing factor in his Uber departure, even while maintaining that he broke no rules. "The problem was I ran too close to the line in too many situations," he said. "When you are big and important, the scrutiny and the expectation is that you don't run that close to the line, even if it's correct."

He traced that intensity back to his previous startup, Red Swoosh, which he described as a prolonged grind: "First four years, no salary, ran out of money several times ... like lose all friends, like everything was just the hardest." He eventually sold Red Swoosh, and said the survival mindset it forged — useful in leaner years — became a liability at scale. "I was running a $70 billion company the way somebody who thought he was going to starve next week would run it," he said.

The remarks quickly drew a broader response. Serial entrepreneur Mark Pincus used the podcast episode as a catalyst to publicly revisit his own conflict with Accel, which he said waged what he called a "jihad" to replace him as CEO of Support.com over concerns about his age and inexperience running a public company.

Andreessen Horowitz, which is leading the Atoms round and whose co-founder Marc Andreessen has his own documented friction with Gurley — calling him "my Newman" in a 2015 New Yorker profile — amplified the episode across social media this week. With Ben Horowitz joining the Atoms board as part of the deal, the firm's enthusiasm for the moment carries a clear strategic dimension.

The episode reinforces a recurring tension at the center of the venture ecosystem: investors provide capital and access, but founders increasingly question whether board seats translate into meaningful operational value — and whether the power dynamics that come with them exact too high a price.

Disclaimer